Newsletter
Don't miss a thing!
We regularly provide you with the most important news, articles, topics, projects and ideas for One World – No Hunger.
Newsletter
Don't miss a thing!
We regularly provide you with the most important news, articles, topics, projects and ideas for One World – No Hunger.
Please also refer to our data protection declaration.
A study published by the Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) examines the differences between globally traded agricultural commodities and domestic niche products in terms of economic, environmental and social impact on the region of origin. The results provide new evidence to make supply chains more sustainable.
What impact do globally traded agricultural commodities have on local sustainability compared to the niche products of the region of origin? This question is addressed in the newly published study "David versus Goliath: Niche products and mainstream agricultural export commodities - to what extent do they promote sustainable development?" by the Initiative for Sustainable Agricultural Supply Chains (INA).
Ten development projects of Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit (GIZ) and the Swiss development organisation Helvetas in Asia, Africa and Latin America were analysed. Economic, ecological and social consequences were focused. The analysis was based on interviews with key actors from the project teams and the private sector as well as a literature review. The results provide new information on how to make supply chains more sustainable and offer a solid basis for future projects. Mainstream agricultural export commodities, due to the size of the industry and their relatively high contribution to gross domestic product, have a much higher importance at the macroeconomic level than niche products, whose contribution to gross domestic product and foreign trade is smaller and often not recorded. However, this perspective neglects marginalised rural communities for which niche products often represent important sources of income.
In the cases analysed, niche products contribute significantly to biodiversity conservation. In contrast, mainstream agricultural export commodities have often been found to be drivers of deforestation. Contrary to expectations, it has not been confirmed that the promotion of major mainstream agricultural export commodities automatically leads to a higher number of beneficiaries compared to niche products. Such projects may even reach fewer beneficiaries than projects supporting smaller supply chains. However, this assessment does not take into account the scaling potential of so-called mainstream products.
Overall, the study shows that there is no "good" or"bad" in mainstream agricultural export commodities or niche products.
Both can be seen as complementary elements within a sustainable landscape approach. The INA study thus provides important food for thought for the discussion of future project approaches. According to the study, however, the following must be taken into account when promoting niche products: As it is difficult to identify and analyse all circumstances and market options in advance during the planning phase, projects promoting niche products should be able to act flexibly. Biodiversity-based niche products are often produced or collected per se in compliance with sustainability criteria. Certification, on the other hand, incurs high costs.
Care should therefore be taken to ensure that the effort required for a certification process is not too high, as otherwise the incentive for smallholder farmers is too low and this can even impair sustainable use.
Find the results of the study here under ‘For Experts’ on the INA website.
Read more The lessons learned from the last food crisis - A solution?
Read more What does it take to truly shift the paradigm on food systems?
Read more "Human capital will play a pivotal role in the transformation of African economies"
Read more When sustainability becomes part of the curriculum
Read more Organic certification as an opportunity for developing and emerging countries
Read more COVID-19 and Rising Food Prices: What’s Really Happening?
Read more Côte d’Ivoire: Sweet Temptation without a Bitter Taste
Read more COP27: Agri-food systems in the focus of the climate discussion
Read more BMZ releases video on the transformation of agricultural and food systems
Read more The Key to Transforming Food Systems Lies in Inclusive Governance
Read more Partners for change - Network meeting on transforming agricultural and food systems
Read more The Agri-Food Map: An interactive map to explore sustainable agri-food systems
Read more Climate change mitigation and adaptation strategies for the African livestock sector
Read more Towards Climate Justice: Securing Women’s Land Rights for a Resilient Tomorrow
Read more The common thread is the importance of collaboration
Read more Ideas on the ground: Local solutions for global challenges
Read more “Corona exposes the weaknesses of our nutritional systems"
Read more Ebay Against Hunger - How an App Supports Crop Sale of Rural Small Holders in Zambia
Read more Reference values: A building block on the road to social equality
Read more Ms Rudloff, what are the benefits of a supply chain law?
Read more Global responsibility: Tackling hunger is the only way forward
Read more Freed from trade? Towards a fairer EU Trade Agenda
Read more Statement from GAFSP Co-Chairs: GAFSP and COVID-19 Pandemic
Read more Sustainable Artisanal Fisheries and Aquaculture in Rural Areas
Read more Nine Harvests Left until 2030: How Will the BMZ Organise Itself in the Future?
Read more The Future of Development Politics: Voices from the Parliamentary Groups
Read more New legal initiatives towards deforestation-free supply chains as a game changer
Read more Achieving more together – New forms of cooperation for sustainability in the cotton sector
Read more Fair Trade and Climate Justice: Everything is Conntected
Read more The Rice Sector in West Africa: A Political Challenge
Read more Controversy: Do supply chains need liability rules?
Read more Do import restrictions really benefit the local poor in West Africa?
Read more Sang'alo Institute invests in farming of sunflower crop
Read more Strengthening the market linkages of smallholders in the face of global supply shocks
Read more How much private investment is the agricultural sector able to bear?
Read more From start to finish: a vision of interconnectivity
Read more Developing countries hit doubly hard by coronavirus
Read more Our Food Systems are in Urgent Need of Crisis-Proofing: what needs to be done
We use cookies on our website. Some of them are essential, while others help to improve your user experience. Your consent is voluntary and can be revoked at any time on the "Privacy" page.
Protects against cross-site request forgery attacks
Saves the current PHP session.
Content from third-party providers, such as YouTube, which collect data about usage. Third-party content embedded on this website will only be displayed to you if you expressly agree to this here.
We use Matomo analytics software, which collects anonymous data about website usage and functionality to improve our website and user experience.